Real economic activity leading indicators: Should we have paid more attention?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The ability to predict business cycle activity is an invaluable skill for governments and policy makers alike, especially before an economy enters a downturn. We analyse causality relationships between key leading economic indicators and economic growth for three countries from 1970 to 2010. We find that while many indicators do not help explain current movements in GDP growth, lags of these indicators do. In addition, the direction of the change and the size of the change in the lagged economic indicators are very important in many cases. This is particularly true for housing indicators.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-125
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Economic Policy Reform
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Keywords

  • Business cycles
  • Co-integration
  • Composite indicators
  • Leading indicators
  • Symmetric and asymmetric granger causality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Real economic activity leading indicators: Should we have paid more attention?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this