Recovered memory practices in Ireland: public & professional perspectives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We surveyed members of the public and professionals to assess opinions and experiences related to recovered memories in Ireland (N = 675). We found that memory recovery amongst therapy-goers in Ireland is relatively common (8%). Likewise, many practitioners (29%) reported some experience with a client recovering a memory and most had actually recovered a memory themselves. However, both groups struggled with definitions of recovered memories: initially reporting inflated figures (19% & 84%, respectively) that incorporated normal, non-repression-related memory mechanisms. Working therapists and current trainees reported a profound lack of training in this area. We also replicated a previously demonstrated scientist-practitioner divide, where researchers were more likely than practitioners to endorse the fallibility of memory. Though the study related to a sensitive topic, both professionals and members of the public reported enjoying the survey and did not find the questions distressing or ethically problematic–encouraging for future research in this field.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)404-415
Number of pages12
JournalMemory
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Keywords

  • ethics‌
  • recovered memory
  • Repressed memory
  • therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recovered memory practices in Ireland: public & professional perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this