TY - JOUR
T1 - Resource assessment uncertainty reduction via bias correction
T2 - On the temporal and spatial sensitivity analysis
AU - Callea, Francesco
AU - Martinez-Perurena, Ander
AU - Giorgi, Giuseppe
AU - Penalba, Markel
AU - Iglesias, Gregorio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - The present study addresses the necessity of a wide and reliable knowledge of metocean conditions for the design and operation of Offshore Renewable Energy (ORE) installations. Statistical bias correction techniques, including a directionally-sensitive technique, are implemented and tested in several locations around the Spanish coast, using information coming from in-situ measurements, with the objective to reduce the uncertainty on wave statistics of re-analysis datasets. In addition, the most effective techniques (i.e. EGQM and DAGQM) are taken as a reference to carry out a temporal and spatial sensitivity analysis, aimed at extending the validity of the aforementioned calibration techniques both in time and space. Encouraging results are obtained concerning temporal sensitivity, showing that a period between 4 and 5 years is the ideal for effectively calibrating several years of re-analysis data, and that a window of just 3 months could be enough to achieve a good bias correction. On the other hand, spatial sensitivity analysis does not highlight a trend as clear as the previous one. Uncertainty reduction after bias correction is limited to the buoys surroundings, and no critical radius could be obtained. Due to the multitude of relevant local geographical factors, such as bathymetry and coast morphology, it can be concluded that correction factors obtained in a specific site cannot always be effectively used to calibrate datasets beyond the observation point.
AB - The present study addresses the necessity of a wide and reliable knowledge of metocean conditions for the design and operation of Offshore Renewable Energy (ORE) installations. Statistical bias correction techniques, including a directionally-sensitive technique, are implemented and tested in several locations around the Spanish coast, using information coming from in-situ measurements, with the objective to reduce the uncertainty on wave statistics of re-analysis datasets. In addition, the most effective techniques (i.e. EGQM and DAGQM) are taken as a reference to carry out a temporal and spatial sensitivity analysis, aimed at extending the validity of the aforementioned calibration techniques both in time and space. Encouraging results are obtained concerning temporal sensitivity, showing that a period between 4 and 5 years is the ideal for effectively calibrating several years of re-analysis data, and that a window of just 3 months could be enough to achieve a good bias correction. On the other hand, spatial sensitivity analysis does not highlight a trend as clear as the previous one. Uncertainty reduction after bias correction is limited to the buoys surroundings, and no critical radius could be obtained. Due to the multitude of relevant local geographical factors, such as bathymetry and coast morphology, it can be concluded that correction factors obtained in a specific site cannot always be effectively used to calibrate datasets beyond the observation point.
KW - Bias correction
KW - Offshore Renewable Energy
KW - Resource assessment
KW - Sensitivity analysis
KW - Wave data uncertainties
KW - Wave direction
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019186221
U2 - 10.1016/j.apor.2025.104818
DO - 10.1016/j.apor.2025.104818
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105019186221
SN - 0141-1187
VL - 165
JO - Applied Ocean Research
JF - Applied Ocean Research
M1 - 104818
ER -