Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Results of flap reconstruction: categorisation to reflect outcomes and process in the management of head and neck defects

  • M. W. Ho
  • , M. Nugent
  • , F. Puglia
  • , R. J. Shaw
  • , T. K. Blackburn
  • , S. Parmar
  • , J. Dhanda
  • , A. M. Fry
  • , P. Brennan
  • , C. P. Barry
  • , J. McMahon
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
  • South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust
  • The Royal College of Surgeons of England
  • Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  • Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust
  • St James's Hospital
  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The reporting of the outcomes of flap reconstruction is often based on numerical success rates. Whilst this remains a useful variable with which to measure success, it is limited in its ability to reflect the complex processes involved. The lack of consistency in the categorisation of outcomes of flap reconstruction in the head and neck could potentially lead us to lose the opportunity to fully capture the implications of its success or failure, or both. We propose a classification that moves away from primarily reporting the results of its binary nature, and focuses more on the process of reconstruction, particularly in the head and neck.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)935-937
Number of pages3
JournalBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume57
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • flap failure
  • flap salvage
  • flap survival
  • Reconstruction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Results of flap reconstruction: categorisation to reflect outcomes and process in the management of head and neck defects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this