Review of climate change impacts on marine aquaculture in the UK and Ireland

  • Gavin Burnell
  • , Ruth Callaway
  • , Andrew P. Shinn
  • , Suzanne E. Grenfell
  • , James E. Bron
  • , Elizabeth J. Cook
  • , Margaret Crumlish
  • , Sarah Culloty
  • , Keith Davidson
  • , Clive Fox
  • , Darren M. Green
  • , Graeme C. Hays
  • , Adam D. Hughes
  • , Erin Johnston
  • , Christopher D. Lowe
  • , Ingrid Lupatsch
  • , Shelagh K. Malham
  • , Anouska F. Mendzil
  • , Thom Nickell
  • , Tom Pickerell
  • Andrew F. Rowley, Michele S. Stanley, Douglas R. Tocher, James F. Turnbull, Gemma Webb, Emma Wootton, Robin J. Shields

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract



Marine aquaculture relies on coastal habitats that will be affected by climate change. This review assesses current knowledge of the threats and opportunities of climate change for aquaculture in the UK and Ireland, focusing on the most commonly farmed species, blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
There is sparse evidence to indicate that climate change is affecting aquaculture in the UK and Ireland. Impacts to date have been difficult to discern from natural environmental variability, and the pace of technological development in aquaculture overshadows effects of climatic change. However, this review of broader aquaculture literature and the likely effects of climate change suggests that over the next century, climate change has the potential to directly impact the industry.
Impacts are related to the industry's dependence on the marine environment for suitable biophysical conditions. For instance, changes in the frequency and strength of storms pose a risk to infrastructure, such as salmon cages. Sea-level rise will shift shoreline morphology, reducing the areal extent of some habitats that are suitable for the industry. Changes in rainfall patterns will increase the turbidity and nutrient loading of rivers, potentially triggering harmful algal blooms and negatively affecting bivalve farming. In addition, ocean acidification may disrupt the early developmental stages of shellfish.
Some of the most damaging but least predictable effects of climate change relate to the emergence, translocation and virulence of diseases, parasites and pathogens, although parasites and diseases in finfish aquaculture may be controlled through intervention. The spread of nuisance and non-native species is also potentially damaging.
Rising temperatures may create the opportunity to rear warmer water species in the UK and Ireland. Market forces, rather than technical feasibility, are likely to determine whether existing farmed species are displaced by new ones. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
Pages (from-to)389-421
Number of pages33
JournalAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
  3. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  4. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
  5. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  6. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Keywords

  • Algae
  • Aquaculture
  • Climate change
  • Coastal
  • Disease
  • Estuary
  • Fish
  • Habitat
  • Invertebrates
  • Littoral
  • Pollution
  • Water quality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Review of climate change impacts on marine aquaculture in the UK and Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this