TY - CHAP
T1 - Scalable, reconfigurable Model Predictive Control for building heating systems
AU - O'Dwyer, Edward
AU - Cychowski, Marcin
AU - Kouramas, Kostas
AU - De Tommasi, Luciano
AU - Lightbody, Gordon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 EUCA.
PY - 2015/11/16
Y1 - 2015/11/16
N2 - Inefficient design and operation of building heating systems can have a large impact on global energy consumption. Traditional heuristic approaches often supply excess heat and cannot adapt to faults and changes in the building and heating system. Model Predictive Control (MPC) based strategies can incorporate future building usage and weather conditions to achieve more efficient heating. While MPC can produce an improved performance over standard strategies, many approaches taken in the literature are not easily scalable and do not allow for intuitive reconfiguration. Two possible MPC strategies for control of a building heating system are designed and compared here. In the first strategy, the thermal comfort of the occupants of the building is balanced with the energy use in a single objective function. In the second strategy, a lexicographic, multi-objective formulation is used to split the competing goals of energy reduction and thermal comfort. The strategies are assessed in a validated simulation platform in terms of energy efficiency, comfort performance, scalability and reconfigurability in times of system changes or faults.
AB - Inefficient design and operation of building heating systems can have a large impact on global energy consumption. Traditional heuristic approaches often supply excess heat and cannot adapt to faults and changes in the building and heating system. Model Predictive Control (MPC) based strategies can incorporate future building usage and weather conditions to achieve more efficient heating. While MPC can produce an improved performance over standard strategies, many approaches taken in the literature are not easily scalable and do not allow for intuitive reconfiguration. Two possible MPC strategies for control of a building heating system are designed and compared here. In the first strategy, the thermal comfort of the occupants of the building is balanced with the energy use in a single objective function. In the second strategy, a lexicographic, multi-objective formulation is used to split the competing goals of energy reduction and thermal comfort. The strategies are assessed in a validated simulation platform in terms of energy efficiency, comfort performance, scalability and reconfigurability in times of system changes or faults.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84963877177
U2 - 10.1109/ECC.2015.7330873
DO - 10.1109/ECC.2015.7330873
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:84963877177
T3 - 2015 European Control Conference, ECC 2015
SP - 2248
EP - 2253
BT - 2015 European Control Conference, ECC 2015
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - European Control Conference, ECC 2015
Y2 - 15 July 2015 through 17 July 2015
ER -