Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Self-supervised clustering on image-subtracted data with deep-embedded self-organizing map

  • Y. L. Mong
  • , K. Ackley
  • , T. L. Killestein
  • , D. K. Galloway
  • , C. Vassallo
  • , M. Dyer
  • , R. Cutter
  • , M. J.I. Brown
  • , J. Lyman
  • , K. Ulaczyk
  • , D. Steeghs
  • , V. Dhillon
  • , P. O'Brien
  • , G. Ramsay
  • , K. Noysena
  • , R. Kotak
  • , R. Breton
  • , L. Nuttall
  • , E. Pallé
  • , D. Pollacco
  • E. Thrane, S. Awiphan, U. Burhanudin, P. Chote, A. Chrimes, E. Daw, C. Duffy, R. Eyles-Ferris, B. P. Gompertz, T. Heikkilä, P. Irawati, M. Kennedy, A. Levan, S. Littlefair, L. Makrygianni, T. Marsh, D. M. Sánchez, S. Mattila, J. R. Maund, J. McCormac, D. Mkrtichian, J. Mullaney, E. Rol, U. Sawangwit, E. Stanway, R. Starling, P. Strøm, S. Tooke, K. Wiersema
  • Monash University
  • ARC Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery
  • University of Warwick
  • Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education (IGDORE)
  • University of Turku
  • University of Sheffield
  • Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias
  • University of Leicester
  • Armagh Observatory
  • National Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand
  • University of Manchester
  • University of Portsmouth
  • University of La Laguna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Developing an effective automatic classifier to separate genuine sources from artifacts is essential for transient follow-ups in wide-field optical surveys. The identification of transient detections from the subtraction artifacts after the image differencing process is a key step in such classifiers, known as real-bogus classification problem. We apply a self-supervised machine learning model, the deep-embedded self-organizing map (DESOM) to this 'real-bogus' classification problem. DESOM combines an autoencoder and a self-organizing map to perform clustering in order to distinguish between real and bogus detections, based on their dimensionality-reduced representations. We use 32 × 32 normalized detection thumbnails as the input of DESOM. We demonstrate different model training approaches, and find that our best DESOM classifier shows a missed detection rate of 6.6 per cent with a false-positive rate of 1.5 per cent. DESOM offers a more nuanced way to fine-tune the decision boundary identifying likely real detections when used in combination with other types of classifiers, e.g. built on neural networks or decision trees. We also discuss other potential usages of DESOM and its limitations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)752-762
Number of pages11
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume518
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • methods: observational

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-supervised clustering on image-subtracted data with deep-embedded self-organizing map'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this