Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Seroprevalence study of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in healthcare workers following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary-level hospital in the south of Ireland

  • Eamonn Faller
  • , Adrianne Wyse
  • , Rachel Barry
  • , Kevin Conlon
  • , Cormac Everard
  • , Paula Finnegan
  • , Claire Foran
  • , Emer Herlihy
  • , Gerry Kerr
  • , Susan Lapthorne
  • , Aimee McGreal-Bellone
  • , Edmond Morrissey
  • , Deirdre O'Sullivan
  • , Grainne O'Sullivan
  • , Joseph A. Eustace
  • , Declan Spillane
  • , Catherine Dempsey
  • , John Benson
  • , Mike Prentice
  • , John Gallagher
  • John MacSharry, Liam J. Fanning, Stephen O'Riordan, Mary Horgan, Corinna Sadlier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective This study investigated seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG antibodies, using the Abbott antinucleocapsid IgG chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) assay, in five prespecified healthcare worker (HCW) subgroups following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Setting An 800-bed tertiary-level teaching hospital in the south of Ireland. Participants Serum was collected for anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG using the Abbott ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG CMIA qualitative assay, as per the manufacturer's specifications. The groups were as follows: (1) HCWs who had real-time PCR (RT-PCR) confirmed COVID-19 infection (>1-month postpositive RT-PCR); (2) HCWs identified as close contacts of persons with COVID-19 infection and who subsequently developed symptoms (virus not detected by RT-PCR on oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swab); (3) HCWs identified as close contacts of COVID-19 cases and who remained asymptomatic (not screened by RT-PCR); (4) HCWs not included in the aforementioned groups working in areas determined as high-risk clinical areas; and (5) HCWs not included in the aforementioned groups working in areas determined as low-risk clinical areas. Results Six of 404 (1.49%) HCWs not previously diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection (groups 2-5) were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 at the time of recruitment into the study. Out of the 99 participants in group 1, 72 had detectable IgG to SARS-CoV-2 on laboratory testing (73%). Antibody positivity correlated with shorter length of time between RT-PCR positivity and antibody testing. Quantification cycle value on RT-PCR was not found to be correlated with antibody positivity. Conclusions Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in HCWs who had not previously tested RT-PCR positive for COVID-19 was low compared with similar studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number051415
JournalBMJ Open
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jun 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • diagnostic microbiology
  • epidemiology
  • infection control

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Seroprevalence study of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in healthcare workers following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary-level hospital in the south of Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this