TY - JOUR
T1 - Set-up variation in palliative radiotherapy
T2 - One versus three skin localisation marks
AU - Cvetkova, Jelizaveta
AU - Craig, Agnella
AU - O'Donovan, Theresa
AU - Mullaney, Laura
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Background: Accuracy and reproducibility of the patient's position is crucial for successful delivery of radiotherapy (RT). Data on palliative patients' set-up uncertainties are sparse. The aim of this study was to calculate set-up errors observed for palliative patients positioned using one skin mark (Group 1) versus three skin marks (Group 2) and to assess the accuracy of both approaches.Methods: Displacements in the left-right (L-R) and superior-inferior (S-I) directions were retrospectively analysed for 175 sites treated with a course of fractionated palliative RT. Population mean, systematic and random errors were calculated in both directions for patients positioned with one and three skin marks. Frequency of deviations was also examined for both groups.Results: The population mean, systematic and random errors for Group 1 and 2 for the L-R direction were 0·0, 4·4, 4·8 and 0·4, 3·1 and 3·3 mm, respectively, and in the S-I direction: 0·1, 3·4, 4·2 and 1·2, 2·7 and 3·3 mm, respectively. Frequency of images within the clinical tolerance of 5 mm was 47·1#x00025; for Group 1 and 65·9#x00025; for Group 2.Conclusion: Three skin marks are recommended for patients receiving a fractionated course of palliative RT, as it reduces set-up error, reduces the number of gross displacements (#x0003E;10 mm) and increases the number of displacements within the clinically acceptable tolerance of 5 mm.
AB - Background: Accuracy and reproducibility of the patient's position is crucial for successful delivery of radiotherapy (RT). Data on palliative patients' set-up uncertainties are sparse. The aim of this study was to calculate set-up errors observed for palliative patients positioned using one skin mark (Group 1) versus three skin marks (Group 2) and to assess the accuracy of both approaches.Methods: Displacements in the left-right (L-R) and superior-inferior (S-I) directions were retrospectively analysed for 175 sites treated with a course of fractionated palliative RT. Population mean, systematic and random errors were calculated in both directions for patients positioned with one and three skin marks. Frequency of deviations was also examined for both groups.Results: The population mean, systematic and random errors for Group 1 and 2 for the L-R direction were 0·0, 4·4, 4·8 and 0·4, 3·1 and 3·3 mm, respectively, and in the S-I direction: 0·1, 3·4, 4·2 and 1·2, 2·7 and 3·3 mm, respectively. Frequency of images within the clinical tolerance of 5 mm was 47·1#x00025; for Group 1 and 65·9#x00025; for Group 2.Conclusion: Three skin marks are recommended for patients receiving a fractionated course of palliative RT, as it reduces set-up error, reduces the number of gross displacements (#x0003E;10 mm) and increases the number of displacements within the clinically acceptable tolerance of 5 mm.
KW - localisation protocols and palliative radiotherapy
KW - palliative imaging
KW - treatment verification
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85090158568
U2 - 10.1017/S1460396919000748
DO - 10.1017/S1460396919000748
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85090158568
SN - 1460-3969
VL - 19
SP - 206
EP - 209
JO - Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice
JF - Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice
IS - 3
ER -