Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sharing in care: engaging care partners in the care and communication of breast cancer patients

  • Jennifer L. Wolff
  • , Jennifer Aufill
  • , Diane Echavarria
  • , Ja Alah Ai Heughan
  • , Kimberley T. Lee
  • , Roisin M. Connolly
  • , John H. Fetting
  • , Danijela Jelovac
  • , Katie Papathakis
  • , Carol Riley
  • , Vered Stearns
  • , Elissa Thorner
  • , Nelli Zafman
  • , Howard P. Levy
  • , Sydney M. Dy
  • , Antonio C. Wolff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Family is often overlooked in cancer care. We developed a patient–family agenda setting intervention to engage family in cancer care communication. Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT03283553) of patients on active treatment for breast cancer and their family “care partner.” Intervention dyads (n = 69) completed a self-administered checklist to clarify care partner roles, establish a shared visit agenda, and facilitate MyChart patient portal access. Control dyads (n = 63) received usual care. We assessed intervention acceptability and initial effects from post-visit surveys and MyChart utilization at 6 weeks. Results: At baseline, most patients (89.4%) but few care partners (1.5%) were registered for MyChart. Most patients (79.4%) wanted their care partner to have access to their records and 39.4% of care partners reported accessing MyChart. In completing the checklist, patients and care partners endorsed active communication roles for the care partner and identified a similar visit agenda: most (> 90%) reported the checklist was easy, useful, and recommended it to others. At 6 weeks, intervention (vs control) care partners were more likely to be registered for MyChart (75.4% vs 1.6%; p < 0.001), to have logged in (43.5% vs 0%; p < 0.001) and viewed clinical notes (30.4% vs 0%; p < 0.001), but were no more likely to exchange direct messages with clinicians (1.5% vs 0%; p = 0.175). No differences in patients’ MyChart use were observed, but intervention patients more often viewed clinical notes (50.7% vs 9.5%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: A patient–family agenda setting intervention was acceptable and affected online practices of cancer patients and care partners.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-136
Number of pages10
JournalBreast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume177
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Aug 2019
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Consumer health information
  • Electronic health records
  • Health information technology
  • Health literacy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sharing in care: engaging care partners in the care and communication of breast cancer patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this