Abstract
There is an ongoing debate on the question if professional activities in the field of the social do actually have a genuinely ‘own’ scientific basis or if their academic standing depends entirely on other disciplines as sociology, economics, administration or law. The present book offers an answer – by actually twisting the question into another direction: the question for the common denominator should not be employed by looking for the original disciplinary basis. Instead, it is more important to look at a common point of reference towards which activities – and research – can be geared. The editors propose human rights as such reference and make in their own introductory contribution clear that any contemplation on such rights cannot be limited on abstract moral and normative questions nor can it be left to the arbitrariness of cultural relativism.
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | New York |
| Publisher | Nova Science Publisher Inc. |
| ISBN (Print) | 13: 9781607414490 |
| Publication status | Published - Sep 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Social Professions
- Human Rights
- Social Work
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Social Professional Activity: The Lowest Common Denominator in Difference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver