Abstract
Objective: To compare suicide registration in eight European countries and provide recommendations for quality improvement. Method: Qualitative data were collected from country experts using a structured questionnaire. Results: Suicide registration was based on the medico-legal system in six countries and the coronial system in two. Differences not only between, but also within these two systems emerged. Several elements crucial to the consistency of suicide registration were identified. Conclusion: A precise model for recording suicides should include: an accurate legal inquiry and clarification of suicidal intent; obligatory forensic autopsy for injury deaths; reciprocal communication among authorities; electronic data transmission; final decision-makers' access to information; trained coders.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 86-92 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Forensic Science International |
| Volume | 202 |
| Issue number | 1-3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Certification of cause of death
- Mortality statistics
- Reliability
- Suicide
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Suicide registration in eight European countries: A qualitative analysis of procedures and practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver