Technical self-sufficiency, pricing independence: a Penrosean perspective on China’s emergence as a major oil refiner since the 1960s

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

International embargos and the withdrawal of Soviet technical expertise had by the early 1960s effectively engrained China’s approach to energy and technical self-sufficiency. Chinese officials cited reasons similar to those advanced by Edith Penrose in her critique of the international oil companies’ (IOC’s) investments. Drawing on Penrose’s approach, this article shows that although self-sufficiency led to significant progress in primary capacity, self-sufficiency had to be reconciled with increasing demand for more complex petrochemicals. Modernisation increased China’s reliance on the IOC’s technology and reduced pricing independence, confirming a historical regularity in the market imperfections underpinning the power of the IOCs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)681-702
Number of pages22
JournalBusiness History
Volume61
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 May 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • China
  • international oil firms
  • national oil companies
  • Penrose
  • petroleum industry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Technical self-sufficiency, pricing independence: a Penrosean perspective on China’s emergence as a major oil refiner since the 1960s'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this