Abstract
The paper presents a comparison between two different wave energy technologies built into breakwaters: the Oscillating Water Column (OWC) and the Sea wave Slot cone Generator (SSG). The applications resulted to be equivalent and economically feasible with a cost of <0.33 €/kWh considering 10 years payback time. The comparison is based on two installations, one for each solution: OWC breakwater in Mutriku, Basque Country, Spain and SSG breakwater in Swakopmund, Namibia. The concepts differ from working principles: the first is based on wave to pneumatic energy conversion where air trapped in a chamber is compressed by the incoming waves to an air turbine, while the second is based on the overtopping principle, where potential energy of incoming waves is stored in a number of reservoirs at higher level than sea water level and converted into electricity by mean of low head hydro-turbines.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings in Marine Technology and Ocean Engineering |
| Publisher | CRC Press |
| Pages | 167-178 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Publication series
| Name | Proceedings in Marine Technology and Ocean Engineering |
|---|---|
| Volume | 2021 |
| ISSN (Print) | 2638-647X |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 2638-6461 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Technological and commercial comparison of OWC and SSG wave energy converters built into breakwaters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver