Abstract
This paper is concerned with the common law-like system of rule making in regard to rights and freedoms under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. It is particularly concerned with citation by New Zealand Judges of the decisions of overseas judges interpreting and applying overseas bills of rights. It is found that overseas authority is not used in a principled or systematic way be New Zealand courts in interpreting the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. In light of this, the paper concludes that New Zealand courts should be more skeptical of overseas authority than they appear to be, and be prompted to ask pertinent questions around foreign authority when it comes to rights-based internationalism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Allan, J., Huscroft, G., & Lynch, N. (2007). The citation of overseas authority in rights litigation in New Zealand: How much bark? How much bite?. Otago Law Review, 11(3), 433-467. |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Nov 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Human Rights
- Overseas Authority
- New Zealand
- Statutory Interpretation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Citation of Overseas Authority in Rights Litigation in New Zealand: How Much Bark? How Much Bite?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver