Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The court as a site of rediscrimination

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingsChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter provides an ethnographic analysis of how Travellers perceive the Courts and 'justice' (in the context of equality litigation), centring their experiences of discrimination and marginalisation. In presenting data on the adverse experiences of Travellers who have taken equality cases to the Irish District Court, Ireland's lowest court level, we recognise the inability of existing desk-based research to capture emotional and memorial elements of adversarial court appearances for Irish Travellers. Speaking to existing literature promoting the importance of understanding how justice is experienced through court observation and lived experience. These observations allowed the authors to experience the Court through the eyes of Travellers, follow-up interviews provided insight into individual experiences which would not be accessible via observation. Ultimately, this discussion feeds into the need for a broader recognition and understanding of vulnerable court-users experiences to adequately inform reform of equality adjudication bodies, enhance judicial training, and enable actions ensuring access to justice for the most vulnerable.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCourtroom Ethnography
Subtitle of host publicationExploring Contemporary Approaches, Fieldwork and Challenges
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages179-194
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9783031379857
ISBN (Print)9783031379840
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Nov 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Court atmosphere
  • Equality
  • Marginalisation
  • Minority experience
  • Rediscrimination
  • Traveller

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The court as a site of rediscrimination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this