Abstract
Argues that cultural influences may not only affect a professional’s implicit concept of what constitutes effective practice, but may also affect researchers’ explicit theories. Suggests that this means that many HRD practices, processes, procedures and language are specific to cultures. Explores some of the reasons underlying the increasing importance placed on cultural issues by multinational companies, touching on a number of theoretical and epistemological debates. Draws no firm conclusions but attempts to locate various positions and boundaries on the universalismrelativism continuum.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 25-44 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Cross Cultural and Strategic Management |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Human resource management
- National cultures
- Personnel policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The cultural boundedness of theory and practice in HRD?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver