TY - JOUR
T1 - The Early Experiences of Health Technology Assessment Bodies in the Implementation of the European Union Health Technology Assessment Regulation for High-Risk Medical Devices
T2 - A Qualitative Study
AU - Alshaikh, Rasha A.
AU - Walsh, Kieran A.
AU - Spillane, Susan
AU - Harrington, Patricia
AU - O'Neill, Michelle
AU - Teljeur, Conor
AU - Ryan, Máirín
AU - O'Driscoll, Caitriona M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Objectives: The EU Health Technology Assessment Regulation (HTAR) introduces joint clinical assessments (JCAs) to harmonize clinical evidence evaluation across Member States. JCAs are commencing in 2026 for high-risk medical devices (MD) and in vitro diagnostics (IVD), but little is known about how national health technology assessment (HTA) bodies are preparing for implementation. This study aims to explore how selected European Union (EU)/European Economic Area HTA bodies are planning for JCAs integration and HTAR implementation for high-risk MD/IVD. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 participants from 11 different HTA bodies across 11 EU/European Economic Area Member States. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim before being anonymized and coded using NVivo Software. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: All participants recognized JCAs as a potential tool for improving evidence quality for high-risk devices and highlighted their willingness to use JCA-generated evidence in their clinical assessment. Some HTA bodies have initiated procedural or legislative adaptations; however, many remain in an observational position, waiting for further implementation documents. Key opportunities identified included work sharing, improved evidence standards, and capacity building, particularly in smaller HTA systems that might not have access to high-quality assessments without JCAs. However, substantial challenges were reported, including regulatory uncertainty, timing misalignments, and limited manufacturer preparedness for JCA evidence demands. Conclusions: HTAR is viewed as an opportunity to strengthen HTA practices for high-risk MD/IVD. However, realizing its goals will require further collaboration, alignment of procedural timelines, and investment in national capacity. Further studies are needed after full HTAR implementation for high-risk MD/IVD to capture ongoing experiences.
AB - Objectives: The EU Health Technology Assessment Regulation (HTAR) introduces joint clinical assessments (JCAs) to harmonize clinical evidence evaluation across Member States. JCAs are commencing in 2026 for high-risk medical devices (MD) and in vitro diagnostics (IVD), but little is known about how national health technology assessment (HTA) bodies are preparing for implementation. This study aims to explore how selected European Union (EU)/European Economic Area HTA bodies are planning for JCAs integration and HTAR implementation for high-risk MD/IVD. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 participants from 11 different HTA bodies across 11 EU/European Economic Area Member States. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim before being anonymized and coded using NVivo Software. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: All participants recognized JCAs as a potential tool for improving evidence quality for high-risk devices and highlighted their willingness to use JCA-generated evidence in their clinical assessment. Some HTA bodies have initiated procedural or legislative adaptations; however, many remain in an observational position, waiting for further implementation documents. Key opportunities identified included work sharing, improved evidence standards, and capacity building, particularly in smaller HTA systems that might not have access to high-quality assessments without JCAs. However, substantial challenges were reported, including regulatory uncertainty, timing misalignments, and limited manufacturer preparedness for JCA evidence demands. Conclusions: HTAR is viewed as an opportunity to strengthen HTA practices for high-risk MD/IVD. However, realizing its goals will require further collaboration, alignment of procedural timelines, and investment in national capacity. Further studies are needed after full HTAR implementation for high-risk MD/IVD to capture ongoing experiences.
KW - evidence generation
KW - health technology assessment regulation
KW - joint clinical assessment
KW - medical devices
KW - reimbursement
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105027255845
U2 - 10.1016/j.jval.2025.11.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jval.2025.11.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 41360323
AN - SCOPUS:105027255845
SN - 1098-3015
JO - Value in Health
JF - Value in Health
ER -