Abstract
Changing consumer attitudes show an increased interest in non-chemical antimicrobials in food preservation and safety. This greater interest of consumers in more 'natural' or 'clean-label' food interventions is complicated by concurrent demands for minimally processed, ready-to-eat (RTE) foods with long shelf lives. Two viable interventions are bacteriophage (phage) and bacteriocins, a number of which have already been approved for use in food safety. Listeriosis is a serious foodborne infection which affects at-risk members of the population. Listeriosis incidence has increased between 2008 and 2015 and has a case fatality rate of up to 20% with antibiotic intervention. Here, we tested an intervention to attempt to control a pathogenic Listeria monocytogenes strain in a food model using two of these alternative antimicrobials. Phage P100 on its own had a significant effect on L. monocytogenes ScottA numbers in coleslaw over a 10-day period at 4 °C (p ≤ 0.001). A combination of P100 and Nisaplinfi (a commercial formulation of the lantibiotic bacteriocin, nisin) had a significant effect on the pathogen (p = 0.001). P100 and Nisaplinfi in combination were more effective than Nisaplinfi alone, but not P100 alone.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 977 |
| Journal | Viruses |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Oct 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- Bacteriocin
- Food safety
- Listeria monocytogenes
- Phage
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of a commercially available bacteriophage and bacteriocin on listeria monocytogenes in coleslaw'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver