The effect of calving date and stocking rate on the performance of spring‐calving dairy cows

  • P. DILLON
  • , S. CROSSE
  • , G. STAKELUM
  • , F. FLYNN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A 3‐year experiment on milk production systems was set up in 1989 to investigate the effect of calving date and stocking rate on the performance of spring‐calving dairy cows. An early‐calving herd (System A) with a mean calving date of 23 January and stocked at 2·9 cows per hectare was compared with two later calving herds (Systems B and C) with a mean calving date of 15 March. System B had a similar stocking rate to System A (2·9 cows ha−1), while System C had a stocking rate of 2·6 cows ha−1. The average lactation yields (kg) over the three years were as follows: 5872, 5444 and 5584 (milk)210, 204 and 215 (fat), 187, 184 and 189 (protein) and 261, 245 and 250 (lactose) for Systems A, B and C respectively. The average milk composition (gkg−1) was: 36·0, 37·6 and 38·7 (fat), 31·9, 33·7 and 33·8 (protein) and 44·5. 45·1 and 44·8 (lactose) for Systems A, B and C respectively. Delaying calving date to coincide with the beginning of the grass‐growing season (System B compared with System A) reduced milk yield per cow significantly (P < 0·05) in all three years of the experiment. However, fat and protein concentration were increased, resulting in no significant difference in the yield of fat or protein per cow. Reducing the stocking rate from 2·9 cows per hectare to 2·6 cows per hectare for cows calving in mid‐March (System C compared with System B) increased milk yield per cow significantly (P < 0·05) in only one of the three years (1990). Milk fat content was increased significantly in 1990. Stocking rate had no other

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)286-299
Number of pages14
JournalGrass and Forage Science
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of calving date and stocking rate on the performance of spring‐calving dairy cows'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this