Abstract
The role of sample size in the estimation of geological strain, both finite strain (Rs) and that of the orientation of the finite strain ellipse (φs), is investigated for clastic sedimentary rocks. This study looks at four strain methods, the Robin method, the linearization method, the Mulchrone and Meere method and the mean radial length method that are initially tested using simulated strained data sets and subsequently by applying the methods to real data. It is found that the optimum strain analysis sample size for a clastic sedimentary rock is primarily dependant on the intensity of strain suffered by that rock because of the error behavior associated with Rs estimates. An iterative process is therefore recommended starting with a minimum sample size of 150, which can be maintained or reduced based on the initial Rs estimates.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1587-1595 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Structural Geology |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2003 |
Keywords
- Clastic sedimentary rocks
- Sample size
- Strain analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of sample size on geological strain estimation from passively deformed clastic sedimentary rocks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver