TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of agroforestry and conventional banana plantations on multiple dimensions of butterfly diversity in the Atlantic Forest
AU - Rossato, Dirleane O.
AU - Iserhard, Cristiano A.
AU - Nakamura, Gabriel
AU - Duarte, Leandro
AU - Nadeau, Nicola
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - Environmental changes, particularly in agriculture, contribute significantly to biodiversity loss, with habitat fragmentation hindering dispersal and reducing biological diversity. Specific land uses can confine evolutionary groups to certain areas, decreasing local genetic and phylogenetic diversity but potentially increasing them at a larger spatial scale. Utilising genetic information at the population level, along with richness, phylogenetic and composition data at the community level, offers a comprehensive understanding of agriculture’s impact on biodiversity. In this study, we compared the effects of conventional and agroforestry banana plantations on butterflies’ dispersal and diversity relative to native forests. Analysing ddRAD genomic data from Heliconius ethilla narcaea at the population level and assessing richness, abundance, phylogenetic and species diversity of the Nymphalidae family at the community level, we found that agroforestry plantations exhibited the highest butterfly abundance and maintained the rarest genetic groups from H. ethilla narcaea. These genetic groups appeared in both native forests and agroforestry areas, more often in native forests, but were absent in conventional plantations despite evidence for extensive genetic dispersal. Regarding species composition, both banana plantations shared similar species but differed from the native forest, which contained a distinct and phylogenetically clustered group of species, possibly due to its unique microhabitat conditions and more complex structure. The presence of the rarest genetic groups in the population and the occurrence of distinct biological species emphasise the critical role of native forests within an anthropogenic landscape. Agroforestry demonstrates the potential to sustain biodiversity alongside food production.
AB - Environmental changes, particularly in agriculture, contribute significantly to biodiversity loss, with habitat fragmentation hindering dispersal and reducing biological diversity. Specific land uses can confine evolutionary groups to certain areas, decreasing local genetic and phylogenetic diversity but potentially increasing them at a larger spatial scale. Utilising genetic information at the population level, along with richness, phylogenetic and composition data at the community level, offers a comprehensive understanding of agriculture’s impact on biodiversity. In this study, we compared the effects of conventional and agroforestry banana plantations on butterflies’ dispersal and diversity relative to native forests. Analysing ddRAD genomic data from Heliconius ethilla narcaea at the population level and assessing richness, abundance, phylogenetic and species diversity of the Nymphalidae family at the community level, we found that agroforestry plantations exhibited the highest butterfly abundance and maintained the rarest genetic groups from H. ethilla narcaea. These genetic groups appeared in both native forests and agroforestry areas, more often in native forests, but were absent in conventional plantations despite evidence for extensive genetic dispersal. Regarding species composition, both banana plantations shared similar species but differed from the native forest, which contained a distinct and phylogenetically clustered group of species, possibly due to its unique microhabitat conditions and more complex structure. The presence of the rarest genetic groups in the population and the occurrence of distinct biological species emphasise the critical role of native forests within an anthropogenic landscape. Agroforestry demonstrates the potential to sustain biodiversity alongside food production.
KW - Agriculture
KW - ddRAD
KW - Microevolution
KW - Pesticide use
KW - Phylogenetic relationship
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105003150714
U2 - 10.1007/s10531-025-03075-0
DO - 10.1007/s10531-025-03075-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105003150714
SN - 0960-3115
VL - 34
SP - 2401
EP - 2424
JO - Biodiversity and Conservation
JF - Biodiversity and Conservation
IS - 7
ER -