Abstract
Although the Suicide Intent Scale (SIS) is a widely used instrument in research on suicidal behavior, comparative research on the latent structure of the SIS has been neglected. To determine whether a general factor model of the SIS is supported, alternative factor models of the SIS were evaluated comparatively in 11 clinical samples. The SIS was applied as part of a structured clinical interview to patients after an episode of non-fatal suicidal behavior. The samples were drawn from 11 study centers within the frame of the WHO/EURO multicenter study on suicidal behavior. Three different two-factor and two three-factor models of the SIS were examined in each sample using principal component analysis with orthogonal Procrustes rotation. The factorial structure of the 'subjective part' of the SIS (items 9-14) was strongly supported, whereas an acceptable model fit for the 'objective part' was not found. Possible future revisions of 'objective' SIS items may be worth consideration. As a limitation, the results of the study might not generalize to other samples that use different definitions of non-fatal suicidal behavior.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 63-79 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Keywords
- Factor analysis
- Non-fatal suicidal behavior
- Procrustes rotation
- Suicide Intent Scale (SIS)
- WHO/EURO multicenter study on suicidal behavior