TY - JOUR
T1 - The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) inflammation criteria to predict survival in patients with advanced cancer
T2 - A prospective cohort study
AU - Pumtako, Chattarin
AU - Dolan, Ross D.
AU - Fallon, Marie
AU - Sullivan, Erin S.
AU - Simmons, Claribel Pl
AU - Ryan, Aoife M.
AU - McGovern, Josh
AU - Power, Derek G.
AU - Laird, Barry J.
AU - McMillan, Donald C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - Background: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria provides a framework for assessing cachexia in cancer patients. However, the role of systemic inflammation in this framework needs further exploration. Methods: This study analyzed a cohort of 388 advanced cancer patients from 18 oncological care settings. C-reactive protein (CRP), the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) were used to assess systemic inflammation. Associations between these inflammatory markers and Weight Loss (WL), Body Mass Index (BMI), Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI), and survival outcomes (OS) were evaluated using Chi-square and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses. Results: CRP was significantly associated with ECOG-PS (p < 0.01), and WL (p < 0.05). mGPS was significantly associated with ECOG-PS (p < 0.001), WL (p < 0.001), and BMI (p < 0.05). NLR was significantly associated with ECOG-PS (p < 0.05), WL (p < 0.001), and BMI (p < 0.05). CRP (p < 0.001), mGPS (p < 0.001), NLR (p < 0.001), WL (p < 0.001), and SMI (p < 0.05) were significantly associated with OS, but not BMI (p = 0.23). Combining CRP, mGPS, NLR, with WL, BMI, and SMI significantly improved OS prediction. WL was significantly associated with OS in patients with NLR<3 (p < 0.05) but not in CRP≤10 mg/L or mGPS = 0. SMI was significantly associated with OS in patients with mGPS = 0 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Systemic inflammation, as assessed by CRP, mGPS and NLR, significantly improves the relationship between phenotypic criteria and OS. These findings support the GLIM framework's inclusion of systemic inflammation as a critical factor. Given its strong predictive value, systemic inflammation should be prioritized in routine clinical assessments of cancer patients, with mGPS having greater prognostic value within the GLIM framework.
AB - Background: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria provides a framework for assessing cachexia in cancer patients. However, the role of systemic inflammation in this framework needs further exploration. Methods: This study analyzed a cohort of 388 advanced cancer patients from 18 oncological care settings. C-reactive protein (CRP), the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) were used to assess systemic inflammation. Associations between these inflammatory markers and Weight Loss (WL), Body Mass Index (BMI), Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI), and survival outcomes (OS) were evaluated using Chi-square and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses. Results: CRP was significantly associated with ECOG-PS (p < 0.01), and WL (p < 0.05). mGPS was significantly associated with ECOG-PS (p < 0.001), WL (p < 0.001), and BMI (p < 0.05). NLR was significantly associated with ECOG-PS (p < 0.05), WL (p < 0.001), and BMI (p < 0.05). CRP (p < 0.001), mGPS (p < 0.001), NLR (p < 0.001), WL (p < 0.001), and SMI (p < 0.05) were significantly associated with OS, but not BMI (p = 0.23). Combining CRP, mGPS, NLR, with WL, BMI, and SMI significantly improved OS prediction. WL was significantly associated with OS in patients with NLR<3 (p < 0.05) but not in CRP≤10 mg/L or mGPS = 0. SMI was significantly associated with OS in patients with mGPS = 0 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Systemic inflammation, as assessed by CRP, mGPS and NLR, significantly improves the relationship between phenotypic criteria and OS. These findings support the GLIM framework's inclusion of systemic inflammation as a critical factor. Given its strong predictive value, systemic inflammation should be prioritized in routine clinical assessments of cancer patients, with mGPS having greater prognostic value within the GLIM framework.
KW - Cance cachexia
KW - Etiologic
KW - GLIM
KW - Phenotypic
KW - Prognostic value
KW - Systemic inflammation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105001025442
U2 - 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.03.027
DO - 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.03.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 40139388
AN - SCOPUS:105001025442
SN - 2405-4577
VL - 67
SP - 344
EP - 352
JO - Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
JF - Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
ER -