TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of nurse prescribing on the clinical setting
AU - Creedon, Rena
AU - Byrne, Stephen
AU - Kennedy, Julia
AU - McCarthy, Suzanne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 MA Healthcare Ltd.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Aim: To investigate the impact nurse prescribing has on the organisation, patient and health professional, and to identify factors associated with the growth of nurse prescribing. Methods: Systematic search and narrative review. Data obtained through CINAHL, PubMed, Science direct, Online Computer Library Centre (OCLC), databases/websites, and hand searching. English peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method articles published from September 2009 through to August 2014 exploring nurse prescribing from the perspective of the organisation, health professional and patient were included. Following a systematic selection process, studies identified were also assessed for quality by applying Cardwell's framework. Results: From the initial 443 citations 37 studies were included in the review. Most studies were descriptive in nature. Commonalities addressed were stakeholder's views, prescribing in practice, jurisdiction, education and benefits/barriers. Conclusions: Prescriptive authority for nurses continues to be a positive addition to clinical practice. However, concerns have emerged regarding appropriate support, relationships and jurisdictional issues. A more comprehensive understanding of nurse and midwife prescribing workloads is required to capture the true impact and cost-effectiveness of the initiative.
AB - Aim: To investigate the impact nurse prescribing has on the organisation, patient and health professional, and to identify factors associated with the growth of nurse prescribing. Methods: Systematic search and narrative review. Data obtained through CINAHL, PubMed, Science direct, Online Computer Library Centre (OCLC), databases/websites, and hand searching. English peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method articles published from September 2009 through to August 2014 exploring nurse prescribing from the perspective of the organisation, health professional and patient were included. Following a systematic selection process, studies identified were also assessed for quality by applying Cardwell's framework. Results: From the initial 443 citations 37 studies were included in the review. Most studies were descriptive in nature. Commonalities addressed were stakeholder's views, prescribing in practice, jurisdiction, education and benefits/barriers. Conclusions: Prescriptive authority for nurses continues to be a positive addition to clinical practice. However, concerns have emerged regarding appropriate support, relationships and jurisdictional issues. A more comprehensive understanding of nurse and midwife prescribing workloads is required to capture the true impact and cost-effectiveness of the initiative.
KW - Advanced practice
KW - Independent prescriber
KW - Multidisciplinary team
KW - Non-medical prescribing
KW - Role development
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84943147378
U2 - 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.17.878
DO - 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.17.878
M3 - Article
C2 - 26419715
AN - SCOPUS:84943147378
SN - 0966-0461
VL - 24
SP - 878
EP - 885
JO - British Journal of Nursing
JF - British Journal of Nursing
IS - 17
ER -