The inter-rater reliability of the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community

  • Elizabeth Weathers
  • , Rónán O'Caoimh
  • , Ronan O'Sullivan
  • , Constança Paúl
  • , Frances Orfilia
  • , Roger Clarnette
  • , Carol Fitzgerald
  • , Anton Svendrovski
  • , Nicola Cornally
  • , Patricia Leahy-Warren
  • , D. William Molloy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Predicting risk of adverse healthcare outcomes is important to enable targeted delivery of interventions. The Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC), designed for use by public health nurses (PHNs), measures the 1-year risk of hospitalisation, institutionalisation and death in community-dwelling older adults according to a five-point global risk score: from low (score 1,2) to medium (3) to high (4,5). We examined the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the RISC between student PHNs (n=32) and expert raters using six cases (two low, medium and high-risk), scored before and after RISC training. Correlations increased for each adverse outcome, statistically significantly for institutionalisation (r=0.72 to 0.80,p=0.04) and hospitalisation (r=0.51 to 0.71,p<0.01) but not death. Training improved accuracy for low-risk but not all high-risk cases. Overall, the RISC showed good IRR, which increased after RISC training. That reliability fell for some high-risk cases suggests that the training programme requires adjustment to improve IRR further.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)469-475
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Community Nursing
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2016

Keywords

  • Adverse outcomes
  • Frailty
  • Inter-rater reliability
  • Risk
  • Screening

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The inter-rater reliability of the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this