TY - JOUR
T1 - The inter-rater reliability of the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community
AU - Weathers, Elizabeth
AU - O'Caoimh, Rónán
AU - O'Sullivan, Ronan
AU - Paúl, Constança
AU - Orfilia, Frances
AU - Clarnette, Roger
AU - Fitzgerald, Carol
AU - Svendrovski, Anton
AU - Cornally, Nicola
AU - Leahy-Warren, Patricia
AU - Molloy, D. William
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© MA Healthcare Ltd.
PY - 2016/9
Y1 - 2016/9
N2 - Predicting risk of adverse healthcare outcomes is important to enable targeted delivery of interventions. The Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC), designed for use by public health nurses (PHNs), measures the 1-year risk of hospitalisation, institutionalisation and death in community-dwelling older adults according to a five-point global risk score: from low (score 1,2) to medium (3) to high (4,5). We examined the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the RISC between student PHNs (n=32) and expert raters using six cases (two low, medium and high-risk), scored before and after RISC training. Correlations increased for each adverse outcome, statistically significantly for institutionalisation (r=0.72 to 0.80,p=0.04) and hospitalisation (r=0.51 to 0.71,p<0.01) but not death. Training improved accuracy for low-risk but not all high-risk cases. Overall, the RISC showed good IRR, which increased after RISC training. That reliability fell for some high-risk cases suggests that the training programme requires adjustment to improve IRR further.
AB - Predicting risk of adverse healthcare outcomes is important to enable targeted delivery of interventions. The Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC), designed for use by public health nurses (PHNs), measures the 1-year risk of hospitalisation, institutionalisation and death in community-dwelling older adults according to a five-point global risk score: from low (score 1,2) to medium (3) to high (4,5). We examined the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the RISC between student PHNs (n=32) and expert raters using six cases (two low, medium and high-risk), scored before and after RISC training. Correlations increased for each adverse outcome, statistically significantly for institutionalisation (r=0.72 to 0.80,p=0.04) and hospitalisation (r=0.51 to 0.71,p<0.01) but not death. Training improved accuracy for low-risk but not all high-risk cases. Overall, the RISC showed good IRR, which increased after RISC training. That reliability fell for some high-risk cases suggests that the training programme requires adjustment to improve IRR further.
KW - Adverse outcomes
KW - Frailty
KW - Inter-rater reliability
KW - Risk
KW - Screening
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84987850231
U2 - 10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.9.469
DO - 10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.9.469
M3 - Article
C2 - 27594063
AN - SCOPUS:84987850231
SN - 1462-4753
VL - 21
SP - 469
EP - 475
JO - British Journal of Community Nursing
JF - British Journal of Community Nursing
IS - 9
ER -