TY - JOUR
T1 - The right to freedom of thought
T2 - an interdisciplinary analysis of the UN special rapporteur’s report on freedom of thought
AU - O’Callaghan, Patrick
AU - Cronin, Olga
AU - Kelly, Brendan D.
AU - Shiner, Bethany
AU - Walmsley, Joel
AU - McCarthy-Jones, Simon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - In 2021, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief presented his ‘Report on Freedom of Thought’ to the United Nations General Assembly. This was the first substantive consideration of the right to freedom of thought at the United Nations level since the right was recognised in 1948. This paper provides interdisciplinary reflections on this report to support ongoing discussions on the appropriate content and scope of this fundamental human right. We begin by addressing reasons for the historical neglect of this right, namely the right being viewed as more symbolic than practical and relevant interests being perceived as already protected by other rights. Next, given there is no consensus on what the right protects, or how it protects, we consider its potential attributes. We then consider potential violations of this right, turning to its application to mental health. Finally, we consider the Special Rapporteur’s recommendations, discussing how some may be realised through human rights-centered regulation in the form of the European Union’s new Digital Services Act. In this context, we also briefly consider relevant aspects of the EU Commission’s proposal for an AI Act. We conclude by outlining pressing challenges facing the development of this right.
AB - In 2021, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief presented his ‘Report on Freedom of Thought’ to the United Nations General Assembly. This was the first substantive consideration of the right to freedom of thought at the United Nations level since the right was recognised in 1948. This paper provides interdisciplinary reflections on this report to support ongoing discussions on the appropriate content and scope of this fundamental human right. We begin by addressing reasons for the historical neglect of this right, namely the right being viewed as more symbolic than practical and relevant interests being perceived as already protected by other rights. Next, given there is no consensus on what the right protects, or how it protects, we consider its potential attributes. We then consider potential violations of this right, turning to its application to mental health. Finally, we consider the Special Rapporteur’s recommendations, discussing how some may be realised through human rights-centered regulation in the form of the European Union’s new Digital Services Act. In this context, we also briefly consider relevant aspects of the EU Commission’s proposal for an AI Act. We conclude by outlining pressing challenges facing the development of this right.
KW - Freedom
KW - human rights
KW - moral panic
KW - philosophy
KW - thinking
KW - thought
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85163725889
U2 - 10.1080/13642987.2023.2227100
DO - 10.1080/13642987.2023.2227100
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85163725889
SN - 1364-2987
VL - 28
SP - 1
EP - 23
JO - International Journal of Human Rights
JF - International Journal of Human Rights
IS - 1
ER -