Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The right to freedom of thought under the European convention on human rights

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingsChapterpeer-review

Abstract

While research on the right to freedom of thought (FOT), as such, is already scarce, this chapter targets the European regional human rights framework in particular, attempting to fill the existing gap in research and literature. It aims to offer an exploratory analysis of the right to FOT through the prism of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and related jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Specifically, this chapter inquires whether the right to FOT can indeed be considered a right with independent value in the context of the ECHR, or whether it must rather be understood as an ancillary right, subordinate to and dependent on related ECHR rights (in a similar fashion as Article 14). In exploring this, a distinction must be drawn between the theoretical set-up of FOT in the ECHR and the drafters' intention compared to how the ECtHR's interpretation and application shaped the right in practice. By focusing on the question of its nature within the ECHR this chapter aims to stimulate further engagement with this under-researched right.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge Handbook of the Right to Freedom of Thought
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages152-164
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9781009539616
ISBN (Print)9781009539647
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Mar 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Article 9 ECHR
  • European Convention on Human Rights
  • European Court of Human Rights
  • Right to freedom of thought

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The right to freedom of thought under the European convention on human rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this