TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in oligoprogressive prostate cancer
T2 - A site-specific analysis of the prospective, phase II RADIANT trial
AU - Ruicci, Kara M.
AU - Barry, Aisling
AU - Ye, Xiang Y.
AU - Chung, Peter W.
AU - Berlin, Alejandro
AU - Catton, Charles
AU - Gutierrez, Enrique
AU - Mesci, Aruz
AU - McPartlin, Andrew
AU - Raman, Srinivas
AU - Winter, Jeff
AU - Dang, Jennifer
AU - Fallah-Rad, Nazanin
AU - Kumar, Vikaash
AU - Jiang, Di Maria
AU - Sridhar, Srikala
AU - Helou, Joelle
AU - Glicksman, Rachel M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Background and Purpose: Changing to next-line systemic therapy is the standard-of-care for patients with progressive metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. However, to preserve systemic therapy options and minimize toxicity, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is being increasingly considered for patients with limited disease progression (‘oligoprogression’). Herein, we report clinical, toxicity and quality of life (QOL) outcomes for an oligoprogressive prostate cancer cohort from a prospective trial. Materials and methods: RADIANT (NCT04122469) was a single-arm, phase-II basket trial which included patients with metastatic prostate cancer on any systemic therapy ≥ 3 months, with radiographic evidence of oligoprogression in ≤ 5 sites. Analysis by disease site was planned a priori. Patients received SBRT in 1–5 fractions to all progressive sites and were maintained on their current systemic therapy. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of change in systemic therapy. Key secondary endpoints included local control, toxicity and health-related (HR) QOL. Results: Thirty-two patients were analyzed; median age was 74.0 years, median PSA 6.7 µg/L, 25% with visceral metastases and a median of 2 prior systemic therapy lines. Median follow-up was 14.1 months (range 4.8–51.9 months). At 1-year, 55.1% of patients remained on the same systemic line and local control was 84.0%. The cumulative incidence of grade 2 toxicity was 25.0% at 1 year, with no grade 3+ toxicities. HRQOL was maintained, with no detriment following SBRT delivery. Conclusion: Among patients with oligoprogressive prostate cancer, SBRT is an effective and safe intervention, including in patients with aggressive clinicopathologic features. Larger, randomized trials are needed to validate these findings.
AB - Background and Purpose: Changing to next-line systemic therapy is the standard-of-care for patients with progressive metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. However, to preserve systemic therapy options and minimize toxicity, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is being increasingly considered for patients with limited disease progression (‘oligoprogression’). Herein, we report clinical, toxicity and quality of life (QOL) outcomes for an oligoprogressive prostate cancer cohort from a prospective trial. Materials and methods: RADIANT (NCT04122469) was a single-arm, phase-II basket trial which included patients with metastatic prostate cancer on any systemic therapy ≥ 3 months, with radiographic evidence of oligoprogression in ≤ 5 sites. Analysis by disease site was planned a priori. Patients received SBRT in 1–5 fractions to all progressive sites and were maintained on their current systemic therapy. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of change in systemic therapy. Key secondary endpoints included local control, toxicity and health-related (HR) QOL. Results: Thirty-two patients were analyzed; median age was 74.0 years, median PSA 6.7 µg/L, 25% with visceral metastases and a median of 2 prior systemic therapy lines. Median follow-up was 14.1 months (range 4.8–51.9 months). At 1-year, 55.1% of patients remained on the same systemic line and local control was 84.0%. The cumulative incidence of grade 2 toxicity was 25.0% at 1 year, with no grade 3+ toxicities. HRQOL was maintained, with no detriment following SBRT delivery. Conclusion: Among patients with oligoprogressive prostate cancer, SBRT is an effective and safe intervention, including in patients with aggressive clinicopathologic features. Larger, randomized trials are needed to validate these findings.
KW - Clinical trial
KW - Drug therapy
KW - Metastasis
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Radiation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010458059
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2025.111041
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2025.111041
M3 - Article
C2 - 40639764
AN - SCOPUS:105010458059
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 210
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
M1 - 111041
ER -