Abstract
The relationship between decision theory and the theory of natural selection in evolutionary biology offers a fertile ground for philosophical inquiry. A topic that has recently been addressed in the philosophical literature is the connection between decision-theoretic and biological discussions of risk. The paper adds to this literature by drawing attention to a distinction between two different notions of risk originating in the economic literature and by exploring their relationship in a biological context. More specifically, the paper shows that the two notions of risk can part ways in models of risk-sensitive foraging theory. The paper also draws attention to an important difference in contemporary explanations of the apparent lack of empirical success of rational choice theory and risk-sensitive foraging theory.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 15 |
| Journal | Biology and Philosophy |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2023 |
Keywords
- Decision theory
- Evolutionary biology
- Risk
- Risk-sensitive foraging theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The two faces of risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver