Theory-building using typologies - A worked example of building a typology of knowledge activities for innovation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingsChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Literature reviews of innovation in organizations continue to demonstrate how the determinants of innovation are ambiguous and inconsistent across studies. In order to simplify the conceptualization of innovation processes, we propose a typology of innovation activities. We contend that typologies are more than simple classifications but are theories. In using typologies we don't assume that all activities are unique but neither do we consider all activities to be identical. Instead our theorizing is enriched by adopting a finer focus based on categories of activities, which will provide more meaningful conclusions about the determinants of innovation. It is the purpose of this paper to be one of the first to offer assistance through developing a blueprint, informed by principles of 'good' theory, for building theory through typologies. We concur with Doty & Glick (1994 p.248) who suggest that such a typology is "intuitively appealing and holds considerable promise for helping management researchers to understand complex, holistic phenomenon".

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBridging the Socio-Technical Gap in Decision Support Systems
PublisherIOS Press
Pages371-382
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)9781607505761
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Publication series

NameFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Volume212
ISSN (Print)0922-6389
ISSN (Electronic)1879-8314

Keywords

  • innovation
  • knowledge
  • Theory
  • theory-building
  • typologies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Theory-building using typologies - A worked example of building a typology of knowledge activities for innovation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this