Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Throwaway citation of prior work creates risk of bad HCI research

  • Joe Marshall
  • , Conor Linehan
  • , Jocelyn Spence
  • , Stefan Rennick Egglestone
  • University of Nottingham

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingsConference proceedingpeer-review

Abstract

In CHI papers, citation of previous work is typically a shallow, throwaway action that demonstrates little critical engagement with the work cited. We present a citation context analysis of over 3000 citations from 69 papers at CHI2016, which demonstrates that only 4.8% of papers cited are presented as anything other than uncontested fact. In 43% of CHI papers sampled, we found no evidence of any critical engagement. Lack of discussion and critique of previous work can encourage the spread of misunderstandings and errors. Authors, reviewers and publication venues must all change practices to respond to this failure of scholarship.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCHI 2017 Extended Abstracts - Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Subtitle of host publicationExplore, Innovate, Inspire
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Pages827-836
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9781450346566
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 May 2017
Event2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2017 - Denver, United States
Duration: 6 May 201711 May 2017

Publication series

NameConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings
VolumePart F127655

Conference

Conference2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2017
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityDenver
Period6/05/1711/05/17

Keywords

  • Bad HCI
  • Citation context analysis
  • Referencing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Throwaway citation of prior work creates risk of bad HCI research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this