Towards a Principled Legal Response to Children Who Kill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article surveys common-law jurisdictions, finding that the typical response to a homicide charge against a child is prosecution and sentencing in the adult jurisdiction. Reforms, such as alterations to trial procedure, and lower sentencing starting points have focussed on mitigating the excesses of adult trial and sentence. A principled approach requires a different lens. Practical strands of an age-appropriate response include custody as a last resort and only where there is a risk to public safety, an automatic prohibition on publication of identifying biographical details, and a child-specific jurisdiction. The prevailing societal interest is in reintegration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-229
Number of pages19
JournalYouth Justice
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • child-friendly justice
  • comparative
  • homicide
  • public interest
  • reintegration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a Principled Legal Response to Children Who Kill'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this