Abstract
This article surveys common-law jurisdictions, finding that the typical response to a homicide charge against a child is prosecution and sentencing in the adult jurisdiction. Reforms, such as alterations to trial procedure, and lower sentencing starting points have focussed on mitigating the excesses of adult trial and sentence. A principled approach requires a different lens. Practical strands of an age-appropriate response include custody as a last resort and only where there is a risk to public safety, an automatic prohibition on publication of identifying biographical details, and a child-specific jurisdiction. The prevailing societal interest is in reintegration.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 211-229 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Youth Justice |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- child-friendly justice
- comparative
- homicide
- public interest
- reintegration
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a Principled Legal Response to Children Who Kill'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver