TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards an assessment of psychosocial work factors in a multi-level mental health intervention in the workplace
T2 - results from the MENTUPP pilot-study
AU - MENTUPP consortium members
AU - Tsantila, Fotini
AU - Rugulies, Reiner
AU - Coppens, Evelien
AU - De Witte, Hans
AU - Arensman, Ella
AU - Kahar, Abdulla
AU - Cerga-Pashoja, Arlinda
AU - Corcoran, Paul
AU - De Winter, Lars
AU - Greiner, Birgit
AU - Griffin, Eve
AU - Hogg, Bridget
AU - Leduc, Caleb
AU - Leduc, Mallorie
AU - Maxwell, Margaret
AU - Reich, Hanna
AU - Ross, Victoria
AU - Van Audenhove, Chantal
AU - Aust, Birgit
AU - Zsak, Eva
AU - Wahlbeck, Kristian
AU - Weeghel, Jaap
AU - Szekely, Andras
AU - Sanches, Sarita
AU - Rapeli, Saara
AU - Qirjako, Gentiana
AU - Purebl, György
AU - Paterson, Charlotte
AU - Orchard, Wendy
AU - Connor, Ainslie O.
AU - Mulcahy, Karen
AU - Moreno-Alcazar, Ana
AU - Mathieu, Sharna
AU - Holland, Carolyn
AU - Hegerl, Ulrich
AU - Hackel, Stefan
AU - Fanaj, Naim
AU - Dushaj, Arilda
AU - Doukani, Asmae
AU - Dooyoung, Kim
AU - Davey, Grace
AU - Alessandro, Luigia D.
AU - Cully, Grace
AU - Creswell-Smith, Johanna
AU - Cox, Laura
AU - Amann, Benedikt
AU - Abula, Kahar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Background: Mental health in the workplace is a growing concern for enterprises and policy makers. MENTUPP is a multi-level mental health intervention implemented in small and medium size enterprises from three work sectors in nine countries. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, delivery, and instruments for the MENTUPP intervention to inform the planning of a clustered randomized controlled trial. Methods: We administered items from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire and the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study measuring psychosocial workplace factors. The questionnaire was answered by 382 participants at baseline, of which 98 participants also answered after six months at follow-up. We calculated mean scores of 19 psychosocial factors at baseline and conducted repeated measures ANOVAs to assess differences in eight psychosocial factors at follow-up. We also examined whether outcomes differed between work sectors and job positions at follow-up. Results: The construction sector and workers with no or a lower leadership role reported more negative working environment factors at baseline. We observed a statistically significant decline in social support from colleagues and social community at work, and a marginally significant decline in justice at work. For the rest of the constructs, we did not observe statistically significant changes. Conclusions: We found significant differences in psychosocial work environment factors among work sectors and job positions at baseline. Contrary to our hypotheses, three psychosocial work environment factors decreased at follow-up. Possible explanations are the utilization of specific psychosocial factors as resources to cope with psychosocial stressors, high participant expectations that were not met by the intervention, insufficient time for structural changes, or the intervention prompting critical evaluations of the work environment. These findings will inform the design and implementation of the forthcoming clustered randomized controlled trial, where they will also be further investigated to validate their significance.
AB - Background: Mental health in the workplace is a growing concern for enterprises and policy makers. MENTUPP is a multi-level mental health intervention implemented in small and medium size enterprises from three work sectors in nine countries. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, delivery, and instruments for the MENTUPP intervention to inform the planning of a clustered randomized controlled trial. Methods: We administered items from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire and the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study measuring psychosocial workplace factors. The questionnaire was answered by 382 participants at baseline, of which 98 participants also answered after six months at follow-up. We calculated mean scores of 19 psychosocial factors at baseline and conducted repeated measures ANOVAs to assess differences in eight psychosocial factors at follow-up. We also examined whether outcomes differed between work sectors and job positions at follow-up. Results: The construction sector and workers with no or a lower leadership role reported more negative working environment factors at baseline. We observed a statistically significant decline in social support from colleagues and social community at work, and a marginally significant decline in justice at work. For the rest of the constructs, we did not observe statistically significant changes. Conclusions: We found significant differences in psychosocial work environment factors among work sectors and job positions at baseline. Contrary to our hypotheses, three psychosocial work environment factors decreased at follow-up. Possible explanations are the utilization of specific psychosocial factors as resources to cope with psychosocial stressors, high participant expectations that were not met by the intervention, insufficient time for structural changes, or the intervention prompting critical evaluations of the work environment. These findings will inform the design and implementation of the forthcoming clustered randomized controlled trial, where they will also be further investigated to validate their significance.
KW - Evaluation
KW - MENTUPP
KW - Public mental health interventions
KW - Theory of Change
KW - Workplace mental health
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85202480225
U2 - 10.1007/s00420-024-02096-6
DO - 10.1007/s00420-024-02096-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 39162783
AN - SCOPUS:85202480225
SN - 0340-0131
VL - 97
SP - 915
EP - 929
JO - International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
JF - International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
IS - 8
ER -