Translation and preliminary validation of a Korean version of the parental reflective functioning questionnaire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the factor structure, reliability, and validity of a Korean translation of the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ). The PRFQ consists of three subscales: prementalizing modes, certainty about mental states, and interest and curiosity in mental states. A convenience sample of 163 Korean parents completed the K-PRFQ. Exploratory factor analysis showed three factors mapped on to the original PRFQ factors, but items from the original prementalizing modes subscale clustered into two additional factors. Data from a subsample (n = 67) showed that the certainty about mental states and interest and curiosity in mental states subscales correlated positively with more optimal self-reported parenting. We discuss the validity of using the PRFQ in collectivistic cultures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-59
Number of pages13
JournalInfant Mental Health Journal
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • crianza
  • Cuestionario de Funcionamiento de Reflexión del Progenitor
  • cultural differences
  • diferencias culturales
  • Différences culturelles
  • Elternkompetenz
  • Fonctionnement réflexif parental
  • Fragebogen zur elterlichen Reflexionsfähigkeit
  • funcionamiento de reflexión del progenitor
  • Kulturelle Unterschiede
  • parentage
  • parental reflective functioning
  • parental reflective functioning questionnaire
  • parenting
  • Questionnaire de fonctionnement réflexif parental
  • Reflexionsfähigkeit der Eltern
  • الاختلافات الثقافية، الأداء التأملي للوالدين، استبيان الأداء التأملي للوالدين، الأبوة والأمومة
  • 养育
  • 文化差异
  • 文化的差異
  • 育儿反思功能
  • 育儿反思功能问卷
  • 育児
  • 養育内省機能
  • 養育内省機能質問紙

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Translation and preliminary validation of a Korean version of the parental reflective functioning questionnaire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this