Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Universal precautions - Do irish anaesthetists comply?

  • N. O'Rourke
  • , M. Bennett
  • , J. Porter
  • , D. J. Gallagher
  • , G. Shorten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background. Anaesthetists are at high risk from blood-borne pathogens. Universal Precautions (UP) include the routine use of appropriate barrier precautions and techniques to reduce the likelihood of exposure to blood, body fluids and tissues that may contain pathogens. The compliance of Irish anaesthetists with these precautions has not been studied. Aim. To study the attitudes of Irish anaesthetists to Universal Precautions. Method. A postal questionnaire was sent to 210 anaesthetists currently practising in Ireland. The questionnaire was based on a model used in Australia and New Zealand. Results. There was a 50% response rate to the survey. Only 15% of respondents had taken a risk history from a patient in the preceding four weeks. Resheathing of needles was commonplace. The effectiveness of hepatitis B immunisation was rarely checked and only 66% of respondents believe implementation of Universal Precautions to be practical. Conclusion. Irish anaesthetists comply poorly with Universal Precautions.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
Pages (from-to)211-214
Number of pages4
JournalIrish Journal of Medical Science
Volume169
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Universal precautions - Do irish anaesthetists comply?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this