TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of guidelines to improve the quality and transparency of reporting oral health research
AU - Sarkis-Onofre, Rafael
AU - Cenci, Maximiliano Sérgio
AU - Demarco, Flávio Fernando
AU - Lynch, Christopher D.
AU - Fleming, Padhraig S.
AU - Pereira-Cenci, Tatiana
AU - Moher, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - Objective The use of reporting guideline is directed at enhancing the completeness and transparency of biomedical publications. The aims of this paper are to present some of the key initiatives and guidelines providing indications and directions on the use of specific tools in oral health research. Methods The EQUATOR Network and five established guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, CARE and SPIRIT) are introduced. Results Five guidelines are presented covering reporting of case reports, non-randomized studies, randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews. The importance of adherence to these guidelines by oral health researchers is emphasized. Conclusions Endorsement and robust implementation of reporting guidelines will translate into improved and more complete reporting in health research. Moreover, by ingraining the use of guidelines, it may be possible to indirectly improve the methodological quality of clinical studies. Active implementation strategies to encourage adherence to these guidelines among researchers, reviewers, editors and publishers may be an important facet in the advancement of knowledge in dentistry. Clinical significance Inadequate reporting of research can lead to wasted research resources and risks publication of inaccurate or misleading findings with implications on healthcare decisions. Familiarity and diligent compliance with methodological and reporting guidelines are therefore essential to maximize the yield from dental research.
AB - Objective The use of reporting guideline is directed at enhancing the completeness and transparency of biomedical publications. The aims of this paper are to present some of the key initiatives and guidelines providing indications and directions on the use of specific tools in oral health research. Methods The EQUATOR Network and five established guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, CARE and SPIRIT) are introduced. Results Five guidelines are presented covering reporting of case reports, non-randomized studies, randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews. The importance of adherence to these guidelines by oral health researchers is emphasized. Conclusions Endorsement and robust implementation of reporting guidelines will translate into improved and more complete reporting in health research. Moreover, by ingraining the use of guidelines, it may be possible to indirectly improve the methodological quality of clinical studies. Active implementation strategies to encourage adherence to these guidelines among researchers, reviewers, editors and publishers may be an important facet in the advancement of knowledge in dentistry. Clinical significance Inadequate reporting of research can lead to wasted research resources and risks publication of inaccurate or misleading findings with implications on healthcare decisions. Familiarity and diligent compliance with methodological and reporting guidelines are therefore essential to maximize the yield from dental research.
KW - Dentistry
KW - Guideline adherence
KW - Oral health
KW - Review
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84925354260
U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.01.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.01.006
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25676182
AN - SCOPUS:84925354260
SN - 0300-5712
VL - 43
SP - 397
EP - 404
JO - Journal of Dentistry
JF - Journal of Dentistry
IS - 4
ER -